Yorum Yap
‘…The *Philosophy of Law* is one of Kant`s latest works, and is so poor that, although I entirely disagree with it, I think a polemic against it is superfluous, since of its own weakness it must die a natural death, just as if it were not the work of this great man, but the production of an ordinary mortal. Therefore, as regards the *Philosophy of Law,* I give up the negative mode of procedure and refer to the positive, that is, to the short outline of it given in the fourth book. Just one or two general remarks on [pg 151]Kant`s *Philosophy of Law* may be made here. The errors which I have condemned in considering the *Critique of Pure Reason,* as clinging to Kant throughout, appear in the *Philosophy of Law* in such excess that one oft
Tükendi
Gelince Haber Ver‘…The *Philosophy of Law* is one of Kant`s latest works, and is so poor that, although I entirely disagree with it, I think a polemic against it is superfluous, since of its own weakness it must die a natural death, just as if it were not the work of this great man, but the production of an ordinary mortal. Therefore, as regards the *Philosophy of Law,* I give up the negative mode of procedure and refer to the positive, that is, to the short outline of it given in the fourth book. Just one or two general remarks on [pg 151]Kant`s *Philosophy of Law* may be made here. The errors which I have condemned in considering the *Critique of Pure Reason,* as clinging to Kant throughout, appear in the *Philosophy of Law* in such excess that one often believes he is reading a satirical parody of the Kantian style, or at least that he is listening to a Kantian…
